« End-to-end | Main | Rivalrous vs. Nonrivalrous »
Words to live by
Our traditional notions of scientific method use thorough investigation based on sound established precepts and distinct, definitive proof to light the path toward acquiring knowledge. But in an age of unprecedented transformation, where new technologies reconfigure our modes of communication and affect the very processes of human thought and expression our traditional methods of acquiring knowledge are called into question. What established precepts are sound? What was true of the past is not necessarily true of the future. If the future that lies before us consists of unprecedented change how can we predict the future?
My feeling is that certain gifted thinkers, even if they can't predict the future, can collectively offer us precious words to live by. I wonder....if we considered them together would these words go even further?
How to predict the future.
One way to predict the future, as we have seen a number of times now, is to draw analogies to past eras that display parrallels to our current transformation (prometheus, the advent of literacy, the renaissance). These analogies help us to shed light on the scale and potential of some processes that may be at work in our current transformation but the trends and outcomes of past epochs do not necessarily correspond to those we are following in our new unprecedented era of change.
Another way to light the path toward new knowledge, to uncover our current truth, is to keenly observe new processes that are inexplicable and seemingly at work in our reconfiguration. This isn't easy to do. Our eyes are naturally trained to the figures of our familiar environment. We sometimes sense the effects of new processes which are profoundly reshaping our world without fully appreciating them. These processes are difficult to describe and even more difficult to explain and prove - at least by traditional standards. The thinkers who seem to have the greatest clarity of vision in this confusing time seem to explore first and explain later. They see awkwardness in the way we tend initially to frame or portray new technologies, which is to equate them to something familiar --they refuse to be blinded by dogma and preconceived notions. They focus on irreconcilable evidence of newness and probe it for insight. Rather than embarking on a lengthy systematic process of complex theory building, they tend to speak in basic truths --pithy statements that contradict conventional theory yet are found true in practice, they think in aphorisms, and they explore with heuristics.
- Aphorism
Pronunciation: 'a-f&-"ri-z&m
Function: nouna concise statement that expresses a principle or truth in a terse, thoughtful manner
- Adage
Pronunciation: 'a-dij
Function: nouna condensed, sometimes metaphorical, but always memorable saying embodying some important fact of experience that is taken as true by many people
- Pithy
Pronunciation: 'pi-thE
Function: adjectiveconcise and full of meaning
- Heuristic
Pronunciation: hyu-'ris-tik
Function: nouncommonsense rule that aids in discovery
Marshall Mcluhan was famous for this type of thinking. By coining phrases like 'the medium is the message' and 'the global village' back in the 60's the minds of thousands were tuned into something important, even if unexplainable, about the global communications revolution that was (and is still) just gaining strength. Paradigms shifted and new understanding was able to take root.
Simple principles from computer science have had the same effect. For years, Moore's law and Metcalfe's law, particularly, have been powerful beacons for the power of computers and computer networks.
This site asks for your 'law' and has posted the laws of many great thinkers.
They include:
(Danny) Hillis' Law
representation becomes reality. Or more precisely: Successful representations of reality become more important than the reality they represent.(Ray) Kurzveil's Law (the notion of accelerating intelligence)Examples:
Dollars become more important than gold.
The brand becomes more important than the company.
The painting becomes more important than the landscape.
In an evolutionary process, positive feedback increases order exponentially. In other words we are getting smarter and more advanced at a faster and faster rate.
They don't have to be laws per se. Whoever first said that the web is an oral/aural medium was brilliant. It gives power to the individual voice. This is the fundamental message of Cluetrain.
It is useful just to make simple straightforward claims that seem to be key principles of the new networking age. Claims like
And there are plenty more of each type.
These probes don't give us the excuse to avoid explanations. Each probe requires a thorough exploration in order to provide whatever evidence there is available to support its insight. However, they do allow us to begin emperically --to begin an attempt to explain things by looking around at the very compelling evidence that is happening right in front of us, and not to tie ourselves down with comparisons to established, elaborate precepts. In some cases those precepts may just not apply to new situations.
To gain insight into the new society that is developing we have to think as much as empericists as ideologues. Even when we don't fully understand why things are happening we have to give credence to the fact that they are happening.
Let's endeavor to list here all kinds of such aphorisms that offer poignant guidance for our journey into the networking age. Maybe we could select the best as a kind of 'ten commandments' for understanding our future. Maybe we could recognize some kind of patterns or order among them.
Please use this space to supply any of your favourite pithy insights --an aphorism, an adage, a law, a rule of thumb. Anything that in a few sentences can give us some words to live by in the awe-inspiring intercreative, interconnected, virtual age we are just beginning to enter. Please provide a brief explanation and pointers to any supporting material.
Posted by Mark Hemphill on March 9, 2004 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341e75ee53ef00d8342168af53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Words to live by:
» Simple from 'if' ...
"Rather than embarking on a lengthy systematic process of complex theory building, they tend to speak in basic truths --pithy statements that contradict conventional theory yet are found true in practice, they think in aphorisms, and they explore with heu [Read More]
Tracked on Mar 20, 2004 3:22:32 AM
Comments
"Markets are conversations", the first thesis of the Cluetrain manifesto, is bang on. See my blog entry: http://www.jarche.com/node/view/31.
Nice application of McLuhan's probes, figure and ground.
Posted by: Harold | Mar 9, 2004 3:48:55 PM
I found a site that had a lot of insightful aphorisims. Here are two that I found particular interesting:
"We owe almost all our knowledge not to those who have agreed, but to those who have differed".
(G.C. Colton; Lacon)
"We live on an island of knowledge surrounded by a sea of ignorance. As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance".
(John A. Wheeler)
Posted by: Shaun | Mar 10, 2004 9:24:55 AM
A plentitude of information leads to a poverty of attention - Keohane and Nye, 89
The number of persons from whom any official can effectively receive messages in a given period is inversely related to the average length of the message (Downs 112)
If goods and services become more valuable as they become more plentiful, and I f they become cheaper as they become valuable, then the natural extension of this logic says that the most valuable things of all should be those that are ubiquitous and free (Kelly, 57)
Member aggregation is more important than the type or amount of resources owned (Hagel and Armstrong, 14).
found here
Posted by: Mark | Mar 10, 2004 12:58:24 PM
- Hemphill's first law ;)
- To gain insight into the new society that is developing we have to think as much as empiricists as idealogues. Even when we don't understand why things are happening we have to give credence to the fact they are happening. (inspired by Lessig)
Posted by: Mark | Mar 10, 2004 2:11:27 PM
We are reconfigured by the image.
Posted by: Mark | Mar 10, 2004 5:40:51 PM
Problems cannot be solved by using the thinking that created them
Posted by: Rob Paterson | Mar 11, 2004 11:32:35 AM
A simple or stupid network faciliates the greatest degree of innovation. (The Future of Ideas 58)
Posted by: Joshua | Mar 11, 2004 12:32:56 PM
One I've been thinking about:
Conflict builds community
We see this most in events like the bombing of the WTC or forest fires in BC. I also think it applies on a smaller scale. When there is conflict, people talk and talking forms communities.
Posted by: Mike | Mar 12, 2004 9:23:38 PM
A picture speaks a thousand words
Posted by: Mark | Apr 1, 2004 6:26:43 PM
The Digital World is closer to the world of ideas than to the world of things - Lessig
Posted by: Mark | Apr 1, 2004 6:27:31 PM
'file managemet' is the digital phrase for craftsmanship
Posted by: tom | Apr 3, 2004 2:49:57 PM
In the networking age credibility stems more from evidence of effort and membership, than from symbolic authority.
Posted by: Mark | Apr 5, 2004 2:06:22 PM
Think Globally, Act Locally
Posted by: Mark | Apr 9, 2004 10:26:30 AM