« From the Information Age to the Networking Age | Main | What's going on inside your computer? »


What is decentralization?

The Networking Age tends to introduce new less centralized modes of communication into our lives and businesses.

I'm going to start here with a look at the term decentralization and then work toward an illustration of how the Internet actually works to describe why it provides such interesting new ways of doing things.

Ok. Decentralization.  What is it?  And why should you care?  Well, when in doubt....go to the Web and what better place to start than by visiting Wikipedia (itself a very decentralized service).

Wikipedia tells me...

Decentralisation (or decentralization) is any of various means of more widely distributing decision-making to bring it closer to the point of service or action. It occurs in a great many contexts in engineering, management science, political science, political economy, sociology and economics - each of which could be said to study mass decision-making by groups too large to consult with each other very directly.

Topologies2png_3Interesting.  When we use terms like centralization and decentralization we're asking how a system involves people and arranges its parts in order to operate and to make decisions.   Centralization refers to the inherent bias in a systems' design toward a central location, a close group or set of individuals for example.  The extreme example of this would be a master and slave relationship between an awful dictator and all his or her subjects.  A dictator like this might set up a system to serve only his or her desires.  All decisions would have to be routed through the slave master.  Society would develop, then, in a way that reflected the master's own wishes.   Decentralization on the other hand describes an inherent bias toward equality for every member, every part of a system.  Paradoxically, an extreme example of a decentralized system is actually the absence of any system at all where all the parts are seemingly isolated and without any mutual coordination...sorta like completely isolated individuals.  But this isn't a system at all is it....just chaos.  So for our purposes let's think of a completely decentralized system as one where decision making is completely distributed, where every member is autonomous. 

This spectrum on the left lays out various ways a system, like an office, a club, an entertainment company, a bus network, a country, heck, just about anything, might work.

Kinda interesting isn't it.   You should be able to think of plenty of practical examples of systems that look like these drawings.   Centralization conjurs up notions of a command and control style authority, where hierarchy is strict and top-down, where power and resources are stored centrally:  A military unit, or a corporate monopoly, might look like a centralized network for example.  Decentralization conjurs up notions of freedom, equality, and empowerment for all members and coordination without formal hierarchical relationships.  Some would add too that the trade-off for what seems like desirable characteristics is a distinct lack of structure, no coordination, and even anarchy - a system where everything just breaks down.  The night sky, or a dust cloud, might look like the extremely decentralized end of the spectrum.  Just remember that it is a spectrum and in practice there are really many shades in between.

So, now that you have an idea what these terms centralization and decentralization refer to....how can the be applied to communication?  to Networking? to eBusiness?  Are there new opportunities?

And how does it affect production, distribution, control, knowledge, expression, and so on.....these are very important questions these days. 

To understand how the Internet actually fosters decentralization let's look at how the Internet works.

Posted by Mark Hemphill on September 18, 2007 in Module I - Introduction | Permalink

Comments

I believe decentralization in networking is as much a security measure as it is a tool of communication. If all information was stored in a centralized mainframe, and that unit was lost or destroyed (no matter the cause) it would have a tremendous detrimental effect on society. Decentralization protects use form threats of all sorts and, despite the threat of viruses and crackers, keeps our information safe.

Posted by: Chad Hayward | Sep 20, 2007 9:37:57 AM

Chad makes an interesting point about information being stored in many placed in order to safeguard that information.

I was working for a call center on Sept 11, 2001. One of the programs that was being supported in the center where I worked was a internet call manager service. Most of that companies infrastructure was located in one of the two twin towers and when the towers crumbled so did their service.

It took weeks for that companies recovery plan to be put in place and for them to restore service. Had they been more decentralized they may have been able to re-routed that which was being serviced at the twin towers to an alternate site and had the service back up and running very quickly.

In my work for Veterans Affairs I work very closely with a contractor who provides our electronic health claims processing system. It is mandated in their contract that they have a disaster recovery plan that will enable them to have our "system" back up and running within minutes. We have also mandated that they store electronic copies of our data off site in a secure location so that in the event of a disaster we can always restore our data and continue to provide health care benefits to our Veterans.

Hopefully we will never have to use our disaster recovery plan but it is nice to know that in this decentralized process we will be able to continue to provided a much need service by having access to our backup data, changing where we process claims to one of the many sites across the country and still be able to access our "system" through the backup site.

Posted by: Debbie | Sep 22, 2007 10:16:09 PM

Decentralization makes the internet extremely intriguing. There is so much information available at our fingertip, yet in many different places and formats. Someone told me a fact the other day,the information available to us in the world today will double in less than two years. It is good that things like the World Wide Web exist to standardize the information on the net, inparticulary. There are so many different resources to find and learn information that it can make it difficult for people to know where to begin. It becomes more of a challenge to find some centralization in a world that is becoming so decentralized. Interesting topic.

Posted by: Krista Mackenzie | Sep 25, 2007 12:23:46 AM

I dont think I get what decentalized means? I have looked it up but im still confused. Is it a recovery plan? Or is it like a back-up system? If someone could maybe help me concept this that would be great!

Posted by: Stephanie Doucette | Sep 26, 2007 8:31:28 PM

Mark, I find the fact that we are becoming more and more decentralized very interesting. Do you believe that our world could become to decentralized? Or, are standards, protocols, the www, etc. bringing enough similarties, enough similar ground to so much information that decentralization is ok?

Posted by: Krista Mackenzie | Oct 5, 2007 10:33:15 AM

Hi Stephanie: the definition is right up there in the post: Decentralisation (or decentralization) is any means of more widely distributing decision-making to bring it closer to the point of service or action.

It's moving authority from the centre of a network or organization, for example, to its sub-units. Understand?

Say our government had one executive office where all decision making occurred for the entire Island.....that would be centralized. Now, say our government had 54 different ridings (instead of 27) with representatives from each riding making their own decisions for their own riding.....that would be more decentralized. Y'dig?

The point is that Networking tends to make the world more decentralized because the technology is smart enough to allow it without sacrifing too much efficiency or coordination.

Posted by: Mark | Oct 9, 2007 8:45:50 AM

@Krista,
Most definitely our world is becoming more decentralized. There are plenty of examples. Our information sources have exploded. We can share information multi-laterally now instead of just through a few exclusive gatekeepers.

Paradoxically standards and protocols help us to facilitate or manage decentralization. They act as coordination mechanisms which are needed in a decentralized world.

Too decentralized? Good question. I believe it is possible yes. But with industrialism and broadcast culture being so powerful for so long we have been growing too centralized recently imho. I suppose too decentralized would be if we all separated into isolated cults with little or no harmonization across groups. But, generally speaking we are far from that. And decentralization doesn't necessarily mean isolation. We can have principled standards and protocols to foster collaboration and coordination even as we distribute decision making widely.

A collaborative, creative and democratic society where everyone could be free to be, and to express, who they are would be a nice balance imho.

Posted by: Mark | Oct 9, 2007 8:59:40 AM

Decentralization in basic words means distribution of power of control, authority and decision making. It is indeed a very important element in networking and internet because as we all know that centralization in internet isn’t possible at all. For instance, let’s consider an example of a very friendly user website – Wikipedia; A huge database of knowledge. If Wikipedia was centralized, it wouldn’t accept or include options for adding additional user knowledge information onto its page. Centralization in networking restricts different routes of outlets and inlets for data. Decentralization overcomes these problems by giving power to other parties rather than keeping it to the core. This website isn’t centralized if you all have noticed. It has another party (exonous.typepad.com) which is taking care of the blogs; there might be another party which might be involved with this webpage which keeps the backup records of its database.

Posted by: Shakti Arora | Oct 11, 2007 6:45:14 PM

The topic of decentralization is a concept that has been around for a while, but in recent years it has been gaining popularity. As Chad has stated above, it is very important for security reasons not to have all of your information stored in one central location. With the threat of internet crimes such as hacking, phising and malicious viruses, a companies computer system could be cracked and have all of their information stolen. It is a security precausion to have your information held in different places.

In recent years we have seen companies, such as Dell, have their customer service and technical support outsourced to companies in India because the cost of labor is so much cheaper there. Not only do they have customer support in India, they have production plants in Brasil, China and elsewhere in the world. These are examples of how Dell has decentralized their companies operations. Although the companies main operations are in the United States, many of their functions are dispersed throughout the World. The invention of technology such as the internet has allowed companies to better facilitate these changes.

Posted by: Ryan Keefe | Oct 13, 2007 8:14:38 PM

Being centralized in kindof like being oldfashioned; you buy your food, clothing and products locally, yours friends and family are local and your job is local. In our decentralized world we can buy things from all over the world and have them shipped to our doorstep, we can have friends and family spread out accross the coutry and still communicate with instantly and we can have a job in japan and do it while sitting at our office on PEI. Decentralization is the way of the present and future.

Posted by: Katelyn Tweedy | Oct 17, 2007 8:59:06 PM

Being centralized in kindof like being oldfashioned; you buy your food, clothing and products locally, yours friends and family are local and your job is local. In our decentralized world we can buy things from all over the world and have them shipped to our doorstep, we can have friends and family spread out accross the coutry and still communicate with instantly and we can have a job in japan and do it while sitting at our office on PEI. Decentralization is the way of the present and future.

Posted by: Katelyn Tweedy | Oct 17, 2007 8:59:33 PM

This is kind of tough because I think both centralization and decentralization have good and bad aspects to them. I do agree that centralization is more so old fashioned and decentralization is a much newer concept. Katelyn has a good point above, however, what does ordering products from across the world do for our economy? Does it support our exports? No unfortunately, such an example is the clothing that is made in sweatshops in Asian countries because it is much cheaper to make them there by paying lower labour costs than making them here and paying higher labour costs and running into ethical labour laws.

Posted by: Lauren Tweel | Oct 18, 2007 12:05:56 AM

Last year in business 101 we were visited by the CEO of a company called Silver Orange. They are a very successful web/graphic design company that is based here in PEI. Imo they are a perfect example of decentralization. They contract their highly saught after work out to companies that are all over the world. They have been offered to go and expand and to set up office in Sanfrancisco with alot of other popular IT companies. However they chose not to expand and they can still successfully run their company from here in PEI. To me this is a perfect example of decentralization and I think we will start to see it alot more as technology advances and people become more open minded.

Posted by: Eric Horne | Oct 18, 2007 1:54:06 AM

I am just trying to make sure I understand what this post is discussing with my own example. If I know what I am talking about, decentralization would be something like this class.
We can go to class and learn the material, and we can also see it on any computer with the internet in pretty much any location. The fact that we don't all HAVE to be in one place is what makes it decentralized right?
An example of centralized would be how for an exam everyone has to come to the class and write the exam in that room, with no exceptions for the most part. That is what those two words make me think of...I hope I'm not completely off with this.

Posted by: Philip Boylan | Nov 6, 2007 12:38:02 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.